FORM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 23.46%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $58.38, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Cirrus Logic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $140.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.57%. Given that Cirrus Logic, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Cirrus Logic, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.184%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cirrus Logic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $561M. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $131.6M. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.47x while Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 5.84x versus 3.35x for Cirrus Logic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research Corp. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 29.46%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $58.38, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Lam Research Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $164.97 which suggests that it could fall by -4.24%. Given that FormFactor, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lam Research Corp., analysts believe FormFactor, Inc. is more attractive than Lam Research Corp..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.777, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.697%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lam Research Corp. offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp. pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.3B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.47x while Lam Research Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 5.84x versus 11.27x for Lam Research Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 91.65%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.3%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $58.38, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $116.58 which suggests that it could grow by 38.64%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.932, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.174%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.47x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 5.84x versus 9.41x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $58.38, signalling upside risk potential of 2.47%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $299.22 which suggests that it could grow by 12.52%. Given that Micron Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.122, which suggesting that the stock is 12.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.523%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.47x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 5.84x versus 7.10x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.